Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|---|---|---|
Izzet Prowess | marco fabrizi | 11-3 | None |
Izzet Prowess | mohammedbinsalman | 8-1 | None |
Izzet Prowess | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 28, 2025 |
Izzet Prowess | moritz hoff | 9-5 | None |
Izzet Prowess | habsmithut | 9-5 | None |
Izzet Prowess | gigachadsigmamale | 6-3 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12774495 |
Izzet Prowess | jan marc marino | 6-2 | None |
Azorius Omniscience , Izzet Prowess , Jeskai Control , Jeskai Oculus , Temur Prowess
Cascade Bluffs ranks #5085 out of approximately 5129 cards in raw efficiency (top 99%).
Colorless average: 45.6%
Performance compared to other Colorless cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Cascade Bluffs is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Performance Efficiency: 11.15 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 0 mana, the average win rate in the format is 47.0%. Cascade Bluffs has a win rate of 57.6%, making it 22.7% better than other 0-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Blasphemous Act | Sorcery | 5 | 63.9% | 2 |
Swan Song | Instant | 5 | 61.5% | 0 |
Narset, Parter of Veils | Legendary Planeswalker — Narset | 7 | 61.2% | 1 |
Thought Vessel | Artifact | 5 | 60.6% | 2 |
Chandra, Torch of Defiance | Legendary Planeswalker — Chandra | 9 | 58.8% | 2 |
Pyroclasm | Sorcery | 7 | 57.9% | 1 |
Restoration Angel | Creature — Angel | 8 | 56.1% | 1 |
Opt | Instant | 11 | 56.1% | 1 |
Gamble | Sorcery | 6 | 55.4% | 1 |
Deceiver Exarch | Creature — Phyrexian Cleric | 13 | 54.3% | 1 |
Cards that perform better with Cascade Bluffs than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Teferi, Time Raveler | Legendary Planeswalker — Teferi | 3 | 5 | 80.0% | 56.0% | +24.0% |
Talisman of Creativity | Artifact | 2 | 8 | 80.8% | 59.5% | +21.3% |
Blasphemous Act | Sorcery | 9 | 5 | 76.9% | 59.9% | +17.0% |
Sol Ring | Artifact | 1 | 8 | 72.7% | 56.8% | +16.0% |
Chandra, Torch of Defiance | Legendary Planeswalker — Chandra | 4 | 8 | 72.7% | 56.8% | +15.9% |
Consider | Instant | 1 | 7 | 71.1% | 57.7% | +13.4% |
Path to Exile | Instant | 1 | 8 | 69.0% | 56.0% | +12.9% |
Wall of Omens | Creature — Wall | 2 | 5 | 66.7% | 54.3% | +12.4% |
An Offer You Can't Refuse | Instant | 1 | 5 | 67.9% | 57.2% | +10.7% |
Izzet Signet | Artifact | 2 | 10 | 65.6% | 55.0% | +10.6% |
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Izzet Prowess | 60 | 6.1% | 43.6% |
Jeskai Oculus | 12 | 1.6% | 49.7% |
Jeskai Control | 7 | 2.0% | 37.5% |
Azorius Omniscience | 1 | 0.1% | 66.7% |
Temur Prowess | 1 | 25.0% | 0.0% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.